Friday, July 30, 2010

Bifocals/Trifocals: Yes or No?

I saw this blog from John and his question hits home with a lot of golfers.

John Spurr says:
Don, I have been talking with a teaching golf pro about glasses. He noticed that I was wearing progressive bifocals and said flat out that they would have to go. He suggests having a pair of glasses made from the prescription for seeing far (the upper part of the bifocal) and that would greatly improve my ability to swing and connect with the ball. What do you think?

The Surge says:
I will start with two stories that will inevitably give you my answer.

When I was at Harbour Town, one of my closest Sea Pines member/students was Gary G.  He played golf with glasses that had a big bifocal in the bottom of his lens.  From the first lesson and the time I played with him, at address he had his head tilted way down and his chin practically on his chest.  I asked him to raise his head. He said he couldn’t because he would not be able to see the ball clearly because of his bifocals.  I suggested that he get a “playing pair” with no bifocal on his “distance prescription” so he could keep his head and posture up and erect.  “But I won’t be able to see the scorecard to keep score” he bellowed back.  I bellowed back more loudly, “Do you want to shoot a good score or keep a good scorecard with a poor score?”  I then added he should get the playing glasses and bring his reading glasses and put them on to keep his better score.

Gary G heard me well but dragged his feet getting rid of his bifocals or trifocals, whatever they were.  Every time I saw him hitting balls on the range, or I played with him, I kept reminding him that playing glasses with no bifocal would really help him improve his ball striking, as seeing the ball better makes it easier to hit it.  Then one day Gary G walked up to me on the range and stood face to face with me and asked me if I saw anything different.  I replied, “Still ugly as ever.  But you have a new good looking pair of playing glasses with no bifocal.”  He took them off and gave them to me and told me to put them on and look closely.  Gary G got ingenious and had his optometrist put his bifocals on top of the lens where they would not be in the way looking down at the ball on the ground and still work well for writing scores.

The second story is about another Harbour Town Student, a dentist from Wisconsin who came to Sea Pines every year around Christmas and stayed through January.  Doc would always take a lesson or two or three.  Doc wore glasses with bi or trifocals.  And from the first lesson, with head down and chin on chest, I was persistent that he needed playing glasses with no reading aids in them.  Like Gary G, he didn’t react and change as quickly as I hoped.  In fact, Doc must have taken 3 or 4 years before giving the playing glasses a playing test.

Doc, like Gary G used a unique way to let me know he changed his playing glasses.  I was in my office sitting at my desk late one December day and there was a knock on my door.  In came Doc. He pulled the chair in front of my desk real close and sat down, leaning his shoulders and head toward and over the front of the desk at the same time asking, “See anything different?”  I said with a happy face, “No bifocals.”  Doc then dropped a bomb on me by saying, “You told me no bifocals would help me hit the ball better.  But you never mentioned how much better I would putt without them.”  Doc went on to relate how much his ball striking improved, but he felt his putting was helped even more.

My optometrist is a 3 handicap golfer and, like me, he is adamant that playing golf wearing bi or trifocals is not good.  He also agrees that progressive lenses are even worse.  Being a golfer, he knows, and mentions the sight problems golfers experience wearing bi and trifocals to play golf.  He makes it a point to ask his patients if they need bi or trifocals if they play golf and, for that matter, play any sport, especially hitting or catching a moving ball.  If they do play, he professionally recommends they get a playing pair of glasses, explaining that without them they will have trouble seeing and focusing on the ball.

The setup determines the motion is paramount for developing and maintaining a good and consistent swinging and ball striking.  Bi and trifocals make getting into a good setup just about impossible with the head having to tilt down so much to look over them to see the ball.  So X the focals and stand tall to see the ball.  It will improve your ball striking, putting and score!

The Surge!

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

.

Please Leave Me Your Comments & Questions!

Tell me what you're thinking... and what part of the golf swing, or this great game... you'd like to know more about. If you want your pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

IMPORTANT: the purpose of this comment section is to foster constructive conversation about improving our blog reader's golf game. This area is NOT designed to answer customer support questions. If you have questions about a purchase or gaining access to our private members area, please contact our customer support team at 800-603-2706 (8:00AM to 6:00PM MST, Monday Through Friday) or click here for email support. We have a new team handling support and they are very good! Please also read the FAQs below as your first course of action.

"The Surge"

Top "Frequently Asked Questions":

Question: I haven't received the product(s) I ordered.

Answer: If you ordered the PPGS Foundations Video Series, or any combination of lesson videos, it's important to understand that these are delivered in a "digital format" in our secure members only area, click here to login and access this valuble content immediately. If you have never logged in before, simply click on the "First Time User?" link at the bottom of the login page and follow the instructions.

The main advantages to this delivery method are; (a) you have access to the content immediately after ordering, (b) you have several different formats that you can view the videos in (including downloadable formats you can burn to DVD and/or put right on your iPhone, or other smart phone, to take them to the practice range and (c) you will get new versions of any products that we revise and/or improve for free without having to wait for updates to be delivered to you through the postal mail.

IMPORTANT: if you want actual hard copy DVDs sent to your home, you can call our customer support team at 800-603-2706 (8:00AM to 6:00PM MDT, Monday Through Friday) and they can get those shipped right out to you for the price of shipping and handling.


Question: I received 1 or more of the 10 free videos, but I'm missing 1 or more. How do I get the free videos that I'm missing?

Answer: You can simply follow this link, put in the email address that you originally signed up with... and you'll be able to view them immediately: http://members.peakperformancegolfswing.com/LostFreeVideos.aspx


Question: I emailed customer service and I never got a response back. How do I get support?

Answer: Unfortantely, email is not a perfect system. If our support team has received your email, they have responded to it... their reply just might not have made it all the way to your email "inbox". If you still need assistance on ANYTHING, please call our customer support team at 800-603-2706 (8:00AM to 6:00PM MDT, Monday Through Friday) and they will take care of you.


  • They're aren't so cheap, but bifocal contact lenses are very useful for all kinds of eye disorders.
  • You know that there also exists colored bifocal contact lenses? Depending on your taste, you can find the pair you like, even online, on specialized sites selling them.
  • I chose bifocal contacts a long time ago and I am very happy with this decision. Although a little uncomfortable at the beginning, on the long term they are the best.
  • Bob Robertson
    Hello Don,

    For whatever reason, I'm thus far one short on my 10 lesson package.

    Out of the seven sent to me thus far ,# 6 did not show.So...could you please forward # 6
    at your earliest covenience.

    Thank you, B.R.
  • Don, your remarks about bifocals are spot on!.
    I get watery eyes when playing in the colder months and have had a pair of distance-only lenses put into a pair of 'wrap-around' frames.
    But I take them off for putting.
    I have found that your remarks about alignment come into play here and whilst looking out of one pair of lenses (my eyes!) is bad enough, looking through TWO sets of lenses is a recipe for missing the easiest of putts.
    Seeing the ball and cup with a little fuzz around the edges matters less than seeing straight!
  • cindy giles
    I read this post on its orginal date and wanted to share my experience since then. I got new progressive bifocals for work without the transition lenses that chage for out side sun conditions. I wore them on an overcast day at the course. I found my self tilting my head way lower than with my other presciption sun glasses. My game was so off. Then it hit me I am wearing the wrong glasses. I went out yesturday and wore my prescription sunglasses and didn't have to tilt my head down to see the ball. This article really opened my eyes ( HAHA) Thanks
  • Rick Hamill
    When I was getting fitted for a set of iron's the instructor asked if I was wearing bifocals because, as you pointed out, my chin was on my chest. He told me the same as you said here. i did get a set of glasses just for golf and I have dropped a couple of strokes since.
  • Louis
    Wish this item had been posted a few months ago! I just got a new pair of bifocals & found I couldn't hit a thing with them on.

    However, I agree with Lance & a few others that the answer, if you need readers to see the score card, is to tell the optometrist to make the bifocal a small area at the bottom of the specs. Luckily I don't & just peer over the top when marking.
  • carolyn
    My husband keeps telling me to get a pair of glasses just for golf, but I told him, "How is the doctor going to know what prescription to write when the distances on the green and fairway are different all the time?". I think my problem is a little different than the two you described, and I'd like your input. A doc messed up my lasik procedure so both my distance, and my reading vision is bad. My reading glasses obviously won't work for hitting off the tee or anywhere else for that matter. My distance glasses don't help me at all on the green for the simple reason is, they're for distance. Here's a final twist, I always wear sunglasses, which of course don't have a prescription in them. Here's to hoping you can help. Thanks for writing this article because it's been a real problem for me (in addition to my back problem). Sincerely, Carolyn
  • Lance Clarke
    G/Day Don,

    Greetings from New south Wales, Australia. First I would like to Thankyou for excellent advice and great DVD's. I am in the process of adapting to the PPGS and after a few days I am aready seeing a big improvement . I completely lost my game after having both of my knees replaced and after trying many of the so called fiixes I nearly gave the game away. Thanks to your PPGS I can now see the light at the end of the tunnel. I am starting to enjoy golf again.
    On the matter of wearing bifocal glasses. I cured the problem by getting my optometrist to make my glasses with a small reader lens at the bottom to enable me to address the ball correctly and still read my scorecard when required. Once again thanks Don I appreciate your great advice it really works.

    Regards

    Lance Clarke

    Australia
  • George Haas, Nevada
    Myself I have issues with both my dominant eye right side and my weaker eye the left side. astigmatism in the right eye thats costing my distance vision-can't see the ball past 160 yards, and then both eyes loosing closer vision. Had a set of transition lenses made for the distance issue by itself, Tried to play golf with them and got dizzy on the tee or when putting. So since I can see the writing on the ball at address I just rely on my alignment and swing and play without glasses. Still having trouble with the swing seem to be taking too deep diviots and loose distance at times. Been working on my stance, alignment, grip, takeaway and at times I hit one pure and straight. Played 18 holes tuesday and I'm back to where I was before breaking my neck in April. Shot an 84 and could have done alot better if I had sunk some putts from inside 10 feet. Also having trouble reaching the green in regulation on par 5's, used to be my favorite holes when I had no trouble getting there in two. Now I'm having trouble hitting my fairway wood, either chunk it, top it, or hit a low screamer towards the hole. The direction is on but the contact is not clean and crisp. I've tried playing the ball farther forward in my stance with a little success, at least the ball gets off the ground for a short distance. Off a tee I hit the Adams Speedline fairway 3 wood right at 230 with a little fade right. wish I could do that on the fairways. Any suggestions.
  • David Springer
    Surge, it may have taken awhile for my overall game to come around, but I am now beginning to enjoy
    playing again. I've been taking a chapter at a time and working it until I feel I have somewhat mastered it. I am now able to play 18 holes and not feel like I'm torturing myself. In fact a couple days ago I played one of the best games of this year. I shot an 87 and that for me is very good. I was in he middle to high 90's. Thanks, your course is great and I've recommended it to a number of friends to at least
    look at it on the internet.
    Dave
  • Tom Head
    To all / John Trude

    >John trude says:
    >November 4, 2009 at 9:46 pm
    >
    >Tom Head - this is the first time I have ever heard anyone say the Bates method worked. I did a >course on the method many years ago but didn’t keep it up; we were even filmed for TV; I was >looking for instant results; a bit like my swing. Maybe I’ll try again. And bye the bye, I knew a ninety >year old who didn’t wear glasses. He said he had done exercises all his life. Thanks for the tip.
    >John

    Well, two weeks to go from -2.75 to -1.00 is not instant, but was pretty shocking for me - I didn't expect to see results so quickly.

    This says a lot about life, I think.

    You expected quick results, and that's probably what the TV crew needed or wanted for "good TV", but you didn't see them (no pun intended), so didn't continue.
    I on the other hand was, from what I'd read, expecting to have to put a lot of effort in for months, so really worked at it and had better and fast results than I expected.

    Perspective is everything; in this case, governing our differing expectations and implementations of the same technique. I was just lucky to have the perspective that gave me high enough expectations to actually bother with the Bates method, but low enough that I was ready to put into it what was needed and not get discouraged.

    Golf is a lot like that, don't you think?
    Many people come to the game thinking it can be no harder than hitting a tennis ball or baseball or cricket ball. But it IS harder, I think. So they get disillusioned quickly and drop the game. Or never put the required effort into learning the game properly, so struggle for years with a bad technique.

    Unlike with my eyes and the Bates method, I went down that "wrong" road with golf. Took a long time for me to realise that I'd gone about it the wrong way from the start due to unrealistic expectations based upon a woefully lacking understanding of what the game really demands, to be able to play it properly.
    Of course, by the time I realised that I'd already acquired a lot of bad habits in all areas of my game from putter to driver, tee to green. Took a long time to get to that realisation. Taking longer to get rid of the bad habits.

    To my mind, that's something that's really a big problem in golf.
    But I understand how it is that way. How many people would even take up the game if they were told truthfully how much work and practice is needed to get any good? Especially if you take up the game as an adult.

    But I think that the golf industry takes it to the other extreme. Quick sale and no, or poor follow up.
    I.e. does nothing to keep our perspective and expectations realistic, and then doesn't give us much in the way of organised help.
    I had no idea that it was so important to get lots of lessons early on until I'd got reasonably good techniques ingrained. Sounds obvious, doesn't it? But it wasn't at all. I didn't know any better. Was that my fault? I don't think so. And I think the industry suffers from a lot of drop outs because of that.

    The perfect illustration of that is that the average handicap has hardly budged in the last who-knows-how-many years. How is that possible? If new players went through the right kind of introduction to the game, wouldn't they/we all be single digit handicappers after only a few years? I'm sure we would.

    BTW, I feel this has a lot to do with the stranglehold the equipment manufacturers have on the industry, but that's another story.

    Tom
  • Amos Terrell
    Dear SURGE and ALL:

    I must respectively disagree on the issue of bi/tri focal and/or progressive lens glasses. I have worn both for about 25 years. first bi, then tri focal and for the last 10 years or so progressives.

    When I a bit younger and stronger, I played to an 8 handicap, using any style of glasses. Now I am older and partially due to illness much weaker and consequentally my handicap is much higher.

    Perhaps I am unique -- but I require the "near" lens to putt -- and I frequently have 6 to 8 one putt greens -- without the near lwns the ball is extremely fuzzy. I also need the "near" lens to be able to focus on the ball at address for my longer shots.

    Obviously I need the "distance" lens to see what I have hit on full shots!

    For me at least, progressive lens with the UV and variable tinting built in work great.

    And please ------ no mention of contacts -- I can not even stand the thought of putting something ON/IN my eyes!

    Just my 2 cetns worth

    Amos
  • Everton McDonald
    Don,
    On the question of Bi-focals, Tri-focals I weare progressive trifocals and you are right about not being able to see the ball properly with glasses on so I play with glasses off. Are you saying a plain pair of glasses will be much better looking down at the ball than no glasses at all.
  • john trude
    Tom Head - this is the first time I have ever heard anyone say the Bates method worked. I did a course on the method many years ago but didn't keep it up; we were even filmed for TV; I was looking for instant results; a bit like my swing. Maybe I'll try again. And bye the bye, I knew a ninety year old who didn't wear glasses. He said he had done exercises all his life. Thanks for the tip.
    John
  • FocusGuy
    Hey guys,

    I'm nearsighted and got contacts to solve all my problems. I have bifocal contacts now and I love them. If something is too close, it goes fuzzy, but at my feet and as far as I can hit it, all are in sharp detail. An added benefit for nearsighted people.... the ball looks bigger sitting on the tee. If i were to wear my glasses, the ball looks about 2/3rds the size it should, with my contacts it looks right. And as Wally said... no more wiping raindrops off the glasses!!! Contacts are the way to go!
  • Ed
    Don,

    I feel like an idiot. Sure, how can you hit that which you can barely see. Makes perfect sense to me hearing it from you. Everything is impacted. How can you set up properly if you cannot see?Physics and statistics dictate that it is practically impossible.

    I wear progressive lens bifocals. Crossed that line at 48. I'm now 55. For years, now I have been stuck at high 80's low 90's. Struggling to get a consistent crisp solid iron shots and consistent putting.

    I noted that my putting has been on and off line for years, while my ability to hit 2-3 inches behind the ball with my irons has progressively become the norm and one of the reasons I was looking to you for assistance.

    My optometrist, after learning I played golf, last year recommended contact lenses and a good pair of sunglasses for the course. Not being a golfer, he commented not on my game but opined he thought it would be very difficult to play with my new progressive lenses.

    For some reason hearing it from you puts the entire thing into perspective. I guess it is time to see my optometrist and take him up on your sound advise.
  • Jim
    Surge I am hitting the ball left of target. I know 95% of these problems is alignment. This is not alignment. I have my alignment sticks parallel left. My toe line, hips, shoulders are good. My divots are bigger than I want them to be and the divots are going left of alignment. Hitting a 7 iron I am ending up 10 or 15 yards left of target consistently. The ball goes straight or with a fade back. What am I doing here? I have hit some shots way out on the toe too. It seems when I bow my knees more outward I am more stable and have more power. I think my "In the catchers mitt" is OK but it must not be. In practice swings I try and make sure that my shaft is in the mitt and on my toe line with the club head up before I go up the tree. Where am I fouling up here Surge? Am I too fast with my arms or hips? I don't know and I have gotten frustrated fast after some good early success with the PPGS. What should I look for and what drills could I check myself with?
    Thanks Jim
  • donn
    i wore progressives and I had a perception distortion playing golf.
    I ended up playing without glasses.
    The depth perception problem went away but everything was fuzzy.
    I would put my glasses back on to putt. Takin 'em off, puttin 'em just made things worse.

    I finally had enough and went and had the lasik surgery on both eyes. It was THE solution.
    The only reason I had the surgery was because of golf.
    My wife thinks I'm nuts, but that's another story for a different time.
  • bob johnson
    i can only see out of my right eye it really gives me a hard time lining up putts and people tell me that i dont line up on my driv es thanks bj
  • Don
    Re Glasses: I have been using single vision sunglasses on the course or years. I had my optician make up a set of lenses for an old pair of "aviator" shades. The large lenses allow me to look down at the ball while keeping my chin up.
    Here in BC the sun is not often present for winter rounds so I had a pair of clear distance large-lens glasses made up. Sent my prescription off to a company in China - and for less than $20, a week later they arrived! I played with them for the first time yesterday and they were great.
  • Tom Head
    Hi guys,
    First, this is not an advertisement. I'm not selling anything.

    If you want to fix your eyes without Lasik, do what I did and try the Bates Method.
    Just do a search on google. There are lots of free resources - I didn't pay anyone anything, except for my optician, because I need weaker contacts. He didn't believe it was possible, of course.
    But now I'm glasses and lenses free. All with simple exercises of the eyes and good vision habits.

    Like I said - free, easy, and it works!!!

    At least it did for me.
    The hardest part, to be honest, was getting used to doing the exercises regularly. I did them about three to six times a day, depending how busy I was, for 15 mins or more each time.
    The muscles around my eyes ached a bit sometimes, but that was a small price to pay for not needing eye-crutches any more.

    My right eye was -2.75 with a fair bit of astigmatism, don't remember how much exactly. Within two weeks I was using lenses of only -1.00 in that eye, and in five weeks total was lens free.

    My left eye was more complicated. I discovered through this process that my right eye was very dominant, i.e. I had a lazy left eye. Funny that my optician never told me that, isn't it, him being the "expert" and all.

    Seems that it's quite common when you have one eye weaker than the other, i.e. needing a stronger prescription, that it is lazy, i.e. the better eye is dominant. This also means that the brain is using the dominant eye more in it's image processing. Which comes first, the dominance or the weakness, I'm not sure.

    Anyway, as a result of the right eye getting better faster, it became even more dominant than it already was. I then had to do a lot more work on that eye, blocking the right eye with an eye patch while I did some of the exercises, to force my mind to use the image for the left eye.
    So just a warning to watch out for that. Find a behavioural optometrist/optician if you can - not easy, but would certainly help.

    The only thing I still have is a little astigmatism in the right eye, but that's slowly fading too.

    Works for long-sightedness too, not just myopia, by the way.

    Good luck!!!!

    Tom
  • Bernhard
    Hallo Don

    I have been following your blogs since I have been registered, but the blog today is very important. .
    I have my own expirience: When I made vacation in Florida ( 2000) I had a pair of glases , stylish and large and only one focal. My putting was always 1, 5 m to the right. So I drawes a line on the beach and realisid the deviation.
    Back in Germany I went to my glasses shop and we developed a very small gals diameter as when you lookk sideways to the big glasses you break the angle. Since then I have a golfing pair of glasses which let me see the ball very sharp at the set up and in the distance I see what I see - its good enough to see the ball. Now I have trifocal glasses which the I really cannot play and for the score card its still sharp enough. So I recomment to have golf glasses as a special pair ( ps I am now 70 and live in Germany)
  • Steve Hale
    I am near-sighted also. I wear glasses for seeing far when I play golf. I can read the scorecard just fine with no glasses. I had a pair of bifocals but after a couple of months, I tossed them in the "round file".
  • Ed
    I 've been trying to play golf with progressive glasses for years and yes you can play golf and I've had great rounds with them.............BUT I just got a distance only pair and they do make a HUGE difference.
    So no bull just fact.
  • jeff
    bifocal glasses are a hassle. bifocal contact lenses that provide good dist. vision and near vision good enough to see the scorecard and read putts are the correction of choice for me. been wearing them for yearsd. need to find a doctor who fits alot of them and is persistant. they take a little adaptation, but worth. i should know, i fit my own and many more every week.
  • gary barnard
    As a golfing optometrist most of what you say is true. Conventional bifocals-trifocals are not conducive to good golf. However, there are ways to accommodate golfers with the proper eyeware. Those under forty-five(roughly) that need a distance correction should wear their distance glasses. For those who need near vision also, they can use a conventional bifocal set very low in their frames. Progressive bifocals will work if the proper type of progressive is provided and set a bit lower than usual. I wear these myself and they don't bother me at all. Also, Transition lenses provide glare and UV protection, an added bonus. Another option is put a bifocal that has a focal length to the ball when putting to make it clear. That's why I keep a putter and measuring tape in my exam room. I have prescribed many "golf" glasses in my forty some years in practice. Seek out a golfing optometrist or one that is familiar with different options it will improve comfort and your score.
    Gary O.D.
  • Lew Brown
    Years ago, many of us rquested distance prescriptions with a small insert at the bottom for the biofocals....it works. Your Optometrist or eye technician fitter will fit you so you do not see the insert.
  • Jim Garvey
    Don,
    Thanks for the article on glasses. I have been wearing glasses with small bifocals for years and always see the ball. You can get anywhere in the world. What's the problem????? Spend a few dollars to see the ball.

    Jim
  • Bryan
    Don,

    What about those of us who wear bifocal contacts. Do you think wearing single vision lenses would be better.
  • Struck a chord, here, Surge! Thanks for the advice. I'm getting a new pair of glasses for the course.
  • Michael Cummins
    Re Glasses,

    Don I have to agree with 'Coombsie'. I have worn 'Varifocals' for nearly ten years - during which time my handicap has steadily reduced. I have no problems looking at the ball - I do not have to bend to my chest to see through the top of the specs - I stand naturally.

    My putting has improved 500% since I started wearing variofocals.
  • philip
    I had my optomotrist make the bifocal part of the lens smaller and just in the area next to the nose.It works great.
  • Coombsie
    Re,Glasses.

    I have never heard so much un-mitigated bull**** in all my life.I have been wearing progressive bi-focals for six years now,on obtaining my first pair I went to the expense of buying another pair with distances lenses in.I played with both to check the effect.First problem,when you change your glasses it takes some time for the eyes to adjust .Nothing better than standing on the first tee feeling dizzy??
    i played a few rounds with the distance glasses-no problem.Played the next few rounds with the progressive-not a blind bit of difference(excuse the pun).
    Anyway, that's my experience of progressive bi-focals,no change in handicap since ive been wearing them??

    Right or wrong,I've got that off my chest.Happy golfing to you all.
  • Rod Olson
    Don , thanks. YAHOOOOOOO, I,m right. Last year I got my glasses redone. I have had progressive lens for years,but these were abit stronger this time. I wore them on our golf night and shot terrible. I added 15 strokes to my game that day. I found that they made my feet and ball look like they were at my knees. Miss hits, putts and everything else. I told my buddies that the new glasses were the cause. They laughed and said I was loosing it. I was right thanks for the info, I'll be sending this to them. Over the past 1 1/2 years of following your tips and videos I've dropped from a 18 hc to a 12. You're the best Don.
  • Denis Demers
    I have reveived only one video so far in the last 10 days why?
  • Rob Stewart
    I have 20-15 vision. When I had my last checkup, I asked my doc for some golf glasses. She asked me why, so I told her I was having trouble hitting with my progressives on. So as the Doc joke goes, she said "Take them off and play!" My distance vision is fine, I just can't read without them. So I only wear sunglasses when I need them on the course, and extend my arms out to write my score down. Works for me! I just thought I had to wear them, not so.
  • Bryan
    Thanks for the tip. Does the same hold true for contact lenses that do the same correction as bifocal glasses?
  • CHAtHOM
    Thanks for that info Surge! I'm going to try the new glasses thing and see how much more my "consistently improved score" will be. In two months the score is consistently heading down-pun intended-LOL! The set up and targeting has helped tremendously. I still need some help understanding the toe and parrell line thing. Also how my front shoulder is figuered into the club target alignment (ie what my hands, front shoulder and club face are pointing at to be properly aligned to the target)?
    Charles
blog comments powered by Disqus
10 FREE VIDEO LESSONS
Need Help? Have Questions? Click Here For Live Chat Help!
Don’s Putting Video System:
Recent Comments
Don’s Driver Video Series
Recent Posts
Don’s Inner Circle Membership